---
bcp_version: "0.8"
file_type: anti_ai
parent: /.well-known/brand/voice.md
last_updated: "2026-09-09"
community_reference:
  source: "BCP anti-AI granddaughter requirement"
  stance: "AI must not override brand truth, human participation, privacy, or facilitation judgment."
brand_additions:
  - "Mentimeter AI should be framed as a helper for creating and improving interactive presentations."
  - "The center of the brand remains human participation."
---

# Anti-AI Guidance

Mentimeter can talk about AI, but it should not become AI-first. The brand is about people contributing in meetings, learning settings, workshops, and events. AI can help draft a question, assemble an interactive presentation, or speed up preparation. It must not replace the judgment of the person facilitating or the lived response of the audience.

## Required AI Boundaries

- Do not say AI knows what the audience thinks before people respond.
- Do not say AI-generated questions are inherently better than facilitator-written questions.
- Do not imply AI can make a meeting inclusive, safe, or useful without human design.
- Do not turn participant responses into training-data language unless the current product and legal sources explicitly permit the described use.
- Do not claim automated insight quality beyond the public feature documentation.

## Preferred AI Framing

Say AI helps a presenter move from blank page to first draft faster. Say the audience still supplies the signal. Say good questions, thoughtful facilitation, and responsible data handling are what make a Menti useful.

Use this pattern: AI prepares, people participate, teams learn.